Cardiovascular Health

Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC)

Epidemiology & Progression:

Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) is a marker of atherosclerotic plaque burden and is highly prevalent, increasing with age; found incidentally on ~40-60% of non-gated chest CTs [12]. CAC score strongly predicts future cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke). Progression is common, with average annual increases in Agatston scores, indicating worsening atherosclerosis [13].

Clinical Value:

Identifying and quantifying CAC, even qualitatively on non-gated CTs, provides crucial prognostic information beyond traditional risk factors [12, 14]. Tracking CAC allows for risk stratification and initiation/intensification of preventative therapies (statins, lifestyle changes) per guidelines [ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease]. Ignoring incidental CAC misses opportunities for primary prevention and risk reduction.

Return on Investment (ROI):

Tracking incidental CAC identifies patients needing cardiology referral and preventative management. Based on proprietary modeling for a medium-sized hospital system, systematic CAC follow-up can generate an estimated $14.7 million in additional net revenue over five years (70% vs 30% capture) through appropriate consultations, further cardiac testing (stress tests, CTAs), and long-term management, improving cardiovascular outcomes [Thynk Health ROI Data, 2025].

Feature List:

Aneurysm Tracking

Epidemiology & Progression:

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) affect up to 5-7% of men over 65, while thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) are less common but also increase with age [15]. Aneurysms often grow slowly (1-4 mm/year), but growth rate accelerates with size. Rupture risk increases exponentially with diameter, particularly >5.5 cm for AAA and >6.0 cm for TAA, carrying high mortality (~80%) [16, ACR Appropriateness Criteria®].

Clinical Value:

Tracking aneurysm size according to established guidelines (e.g., Society for Vascular Surgery, ACR) is critical for determining surveillance intervals and timing of elective repair [16, ACR Appropriateness Criteria®]. Timely intervention significantly reduces rupture risk and mortality compared to emergency surgery. Failure to track aneurysms risks catastrophic rupture due to missed growth or exceeding repair thresholds [17].

Return on Investment (ROI):

Consistent aneurysm tracking ensures guideline-adherent surveillance and timely referrals for vascular surgery consults and elective repair. Based on proprietary modeling for a medium-sized hospital system, this proactive management via Thynk Health can capture an estimated $4.6 million in additional net revenue over five years (70% vs 30% capture) through imaging, consultations, and high-value surgical interventions, while preventing costly emergent cases [Thynk Health ROI Data, 2025].

Feature List:

Valvular Calcification

Epidemiology & Progression:

Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is common in older adults, present on CT in over 50% of those >65 years old, and is a precursor to aortic stenosis (AS) [18]. Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is also prevalent. While often asymptomatic initially, progression can lead to significant valvular dysfunction (stenosis or regurgitation) requiring intervention. Severe AS prevalence is estimated at 2-7% in those >65 [19].

Clinical Value:

Incidental detection of valvular calcification on CT warrants clinical correlation and often echocardiography to assess hemodynamic significance [18, 20]. Tracking allows for monitoring progression and timely referral to cardiology for management, including potential valve replacement for severe, symptomatic disease [ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease]. Ignoring these findings can lead to delayed diagnosis of severe valve disease and associated heart failure or sudden death.

Return on Investment (ROI):

Identifying patients with significant valvular calcification facilitates appropriate cardiac workup. While specific ROI data for isolated valvular calcification tracking isn't available in the provided memory, systems managing related cardiovascular findings like CAC show significant gains. Proactive tracking likely yields substantial ROI through echocardiograms, cardiology consults, and eventual high-revenue valve interventions (TAVR, SAVR), estimated to be in the millions of dollars over 5 years for a medium-sized system by preventing patient leakage for these procedures [Educated Estimate based on CAC ROI & Procedure Costs, 21].

Feature List:

Important Note on ROI: The Return on Investment (ROI) figures presented are derived from Thynk Health's proprietary performance data analysis. These calculations are based on models simulating a medium-sized hospital system processing approximately 600,000 CT scans annually through emergency departments and utilizing multispecialty guidelines for follow-up care pathways and associated downstream revenue capture. Actual ROI may vary based on specific institutional factors, patient populations, and payer mix.

References:

[1] GLOBOCAN 2020 / Cancer.org
[2] National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. (2011). Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening. NEJM.
[3] Pinsky, P. F., Gierada, D. S., Black, W., Munden, R., Nath, H., Aberle, D., & Kazerooni, E. (2015). Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment. Annals of internal medicine.
[4] Lee, C. I., et al. (2013). Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of incidental findings. Radiology.
[5] Eberth, J. M., et al. (2019). Use of Mobile Computed Tomography Clinics for Lung Cancer Screening. JAMA Internal Medicine.
[6] Thynk Health White Paper: Mobile Lung Cancer Screening Coordination. [Placeholder]
[7] Putman, R. K., et al. (2016). Association Between Interstitial Lung Abnormalities and All-Cause Mortality. JAMA.
[8] Hatabu, H., et al. (2020). Interstitial Lung Abnormalities Detected Incidentally on CT: A White Paper. Recommendations from the Fleischner Society. Radiology.
[9] Gould, M. K., et al. (2013). Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest.
[10] MacMahon, H., et al. (2017). Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology.
[11] Thynk Health White Paper: Incidental Findings Management. (Referenced in memory)
[12] Hecht, H. S., et al. (2017). Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning: Clinical and Prognostic Impact. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.
[13] Lehmann, N., et al. (2014). Coronary artery calcium progression: a landmark study. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.
[14] ACR–SPR–SSR Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of Cardiac Computed Tomography (CT).
[15] Upchurch Jr, G. R., & Schaub, T. A. (2006). Abdominal aortic aneurysm. American family physician.
[16] Chaikof, E. L., et al. (2018). The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of vascular surgery.
[17] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pulsatile Abdominal Mass Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
[18] Messika-Zeitoun, D., et al. (2007). Assessment and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation.
[19] Osnabrugge, R. L., et al. (2013). Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.
[20] Otto, C. M., et al. (2021). 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. JACC.
[21] Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA) / Published hospital chargemasters. [General reference for procedure costs]
[22] Elta, G. H., et al. (2018). ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts. American Journal of Gastroenterology.
[23] Berland, L. L., et al. (2017). Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology. (Covers Pancreas)
[24] Scheiman, J. M., et al. (2007). Screening for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology.
[25] Corwin, M. T., et al. (2011). Incidental gallbladder polyps: when to resect and when to observe. American Journal of Roentgenology.
[26] Wiles, R., et al. (2017). Management of gallbladder polyps. World Journal of Gastroenterology. / Foley, K. G., et al. (2021). ESGAR consensus statement on the imaging and management of gallbladder polyps. European Radiology.
[27] Hundal, R., & Shaffer, E. A. (2014). Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clinical epidemiology.
[28] Ghonge, N. P., et al. (2010). Incidental splenic lesions. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.
[29] Berland, L. L., et al. (2010). Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology. (Covers Spleen, Liver, Adrenal, Renal)
[30] Jones, M. P. (2015). Evaluation and treatment of hiatal hernias. Surgical Clinics.
[31] Kohn, G. P., et al. (2013). Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. SAGES.
[32] Strate, L. L., & Morris, A. M. (2019). Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of diverticulitis. Gastroenterology.
[33] Peery, A. F., et al. (2015). AGA technical review on the management of acute diverticulitis. Gastroenterology.
[34] Gore, R. M., et al. (2011). Incidental liver lesions: pattern-based classification on CT. Cancer Imaging.
[35] Marrero, J. A., et al. (2018). Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology.
[36] Younossi, Z. M., et al. (2016). Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology.
[37] Rinella, M. E., et al. (2023). AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology.
[38] Hoang, J. K., et al. (2015). Managing incidental thyroid nodules detected on imaging: white paper of the ACR Incidental Thyroid Findings Committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology.
[39] Tessler, F. N., et al. (2017). ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology.
[40] Mayo-Smith, W. W., et al. (2017). Management of incidental adrenal masses: a white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology.
[41] Fassnacht, M., et al. (2016). Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. European journal of endocrinology.
[42] Silverman, S. G., et al. (2017). Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology. / Israel, G. M., et al. (2017). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Renal Mass-Solid and Cystic Lesions. Journal of the American College of Radiology.
[43] Ljungberg, B., et al. (2016). EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. European urology.
[44] Turkbey, B., et al. (2019). PI-RADS 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System. Radiology.
[45] Sickles, E. A., et al. (2013). ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology.
[46] Levine, D., et al. (2010). Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology. / Patel, M. D., et al. (2018). ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass. Journal of the American College of Radiology.
[47] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2016). Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Obstetrics & Gynecology.
[48] Stewart, E. A., et al. (2017). Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
[49] Thompson, R. J., et al. (2011). Incidental findings on CT scans in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine International.
[50] Dalal, A. K., et al. (2014). Closing the loop: ensuring effective communication of critical imaging results. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.